Healthcare

Outcome statement

Transitioning to modern, high quality, low carbon models of care for our patients, guided by the principles of sustainable healthcare.

Governance and delivery

Why is this important?

The Net Zero Government Operations Policy sets a range of actions for 窪蹋勛圖厙 Health targeting scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. It outlines requirements for the health system to identify its largest scope 3 emissions sources and make plans to address them.

Clinical care - providing high quality healthcare to our patients - is at the heart of 窪蹋勛圖厙 Health. Our clinicians - nurses, doctors, and allied health professionals - will all play a crucial role in developing modern high quality, low carbon models of care. National and international research demonstrates that more than half of healthcares carbon footprint is supply chain emissions from clinical care (pharmaceuticals, medical devices, equipment etc).4 The evidence and increasingly our own experience in 窪蹋勛圖厙 Health demonstrates that we can improve health outcomes and patient experience, whilst reducing waste and carbon emissions.

Principles of sustainable healthcare

Three principles of sustainable healthcare guide our approach to reducing emissions:

  1. Keep people healthy and well. People who are healthy, well and independent in their homes and communities have high health and social outcomes and less reliance on carbon intensive areas of the health system. The delivery of public and population health services that reduce the onset and burden of disease, improve air quality, enable and support active travel and promote healthy diets and lifestyles, simultaneously reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.2,4
  2. Focus on value-based healthcare. Focusing on value-based healthcare reduces the harms, risks and costs (financial and environmental) of low-value care (unnecessary investigations, procedures and medicines). This includes tackling unwarranted variation, reducing overdiagnosis, overtreatment, unnecessary imaging and pathology testing by promoting a value based healthcare approach.2 This improves health outcomes that matter to patients and provide a better experience for staff.
  3. Decarbonise evidence-based care. Where there is effective, evidence-based care, deliver it in low- carbon ways. This includes prioritising appropriate healthcare delivery and decarbonising known emissions hotspots across clinical specialties.

What we learnt from the consultation

The consultation process confirmed what is working well in the system and identified priorities and areas that are in most need of improvement.

What is working well

There were many examples of what is working well shared during the consultation, including:

  • Interventions focused on reducing low value care and unwarranted healthcare variation, for example the Rational Investigations Program achieved a 29% reduction in pathology tests at Coffs Harbour Emergency Department.
  • Improvements and changes to the way in which care is delivered, with virtual care delivering care closer to home providing more accessible care and reducing travel emissions. For example the telehealth stroke service which is reducing inappropriate transfer of patients and providing high-quality stroke care.
  • Investment in precision medicine, cell and molecular therapies that are reducing the healthcare burden, improving patient outcomes and reducing environmental impacts.
  • Digitisation programs and initiatives, for example e-Referrals, that are reducing our reliance on paper or phasing out paper altogether with the transition to paperless operations.
  • Reducing emissions of medicines, in particular, medicines and gases with very high GWP, including volatile anaesthetic gases (desflurane) and nitrous oxide.
  • Switching from single-use equipment and plastic items to reusable or more sustainable alternatives, such as introducing metal holloware and reusable gowns in operating theatres.
  • Refurbishment for example Enable窪蹋勛圖厙s Going Circular pilot project.
  • Establishment of green teams, sustainability committees and working groups supporting clinical champions. The 窪蹋勛圖厙 Health Sustainability Network acts as a connector across the 窪蹋勛圖厙 Health system supporting champions and driving collaboration.

What will be different in 2030

Moving forward there is a need to scale existing best practice, including:

  • Investing in research and building the evidence base about effective interventions that improve health outcomes and reduce clinical care emissions, including investing in clinical pathway, carbon hotspot and life cycle assessments of medical equipment and devices. The consultation emphasised the need to invest in approaches that identify, measure and address unwarranted variation and reduce low value care.
  • Leveraging digital solutions, such as virtual care and artificial intelligence, that improve access and health communication, particularly for regional and rural communities. Measurement of the co-benefits of reduced transport-related emissions should be considered.
  • Take a Health in All Policies approach promoting the health co-benefits of emission reductions across society and adaption action beyond the health system.
  • Promoting a public health perspective that prioritises population health and prevention programs that assist with both the mitigation and adaptation agendas. Keeping people healthy and well through investing in wellness, prevention and early detection reduces the need for healthcare and associated emissions.
  • Expand education, training and professional development options for staff and students at all levels to address knowledge and skill gaps. Improving staff education was identified as a priority. Opportunities include incorporating sustainable healthcare and climate resilience principles in staff training, education and quality improvement processes to help mobilise the health workforce to act.
  • Promoting knowledge sharing and data collection across the state, supporting adoption of best practices in reducing clinical care emissions and climate action. Focus on measurement of all emissions to track and report on progress.
  • Collaborating with the Commonwealth, 窪蹋勛圖厙 Government, professional bodies and key partners to decarbonise clinical care and improve the social determinants of health in a changing climate.
A group of 窪蹋勛圖厙 Health staff
South Western Sydney Local Health District, Reducing the Use of Disposable Nonsterile Barrier Plastic Gowns

Supporting initiatives

Case study: Anaesthetists switching to more sustainable anaesthetic gases

Anaesthetic gases comprise ~2% of NSLHDs carbon footprint. One gas, desflurane, has a global warming potential (GWP100) that is 2,540 times greater than carbon dioxide, making it a potent greenhouse gas.7 In 2022, a team of anaesthetists at NSLHD set about reducing the impact of desflurane by encouraging a switch to using alternative and less polluting anaesthetic gases while continuing to deliver safe, high-quality healthcare.

A multifaceted project was implemented across the district, including a staff education and awareness raising campaign, training to support practice changes, and audits to monitor desflurane use.

The project was successful in significantly reducing desflurane use from 35 bottles per month to only four bottles over the 2022/23 financial year at Royal North Shore Hospital. This is equal to a reduction of carbon emissions from 1,321 tonnes to 0.75 tonnes. A direct cost saving of $344,087 and a global social cost saving of $105,048 per year was also calculated.8

Subsequently, the 窪蹋勛圖厙 Medicines Formulary Committee endorsed the decision to remove desflurane from the Formulary.

Case study: Environmental impact of desflurane

The 窪蹋勛圖厙 Medicines Formulary Committee endorsed a decision to remove desflurane from the Formulary, effective from March 2024.

Many health systems in Australia and internationally are phasing out desflurane, and its use in 窪蹋勛圖厙 Health has reduced substantially in recent years as anaesthetists shift towards safe, clinically equivalent and less polluting alternatives.

The Committee cited three reasons for the decision: the availability of safe and clinically equivalent alternatives to desflurane, the high cost of desflurane and concerns about desfluranes environmental impact.

Case study: NSLHDs Net Zero Leads Program 2022-24

NSLHD has established an Australian first Net Zero Leads Program which supports clinicians to lead a project to reduce emissions in their specialty or service. Twelve clinicians from anaesthetics and surgery, endocrinology, respiratory medicine, paediatrics, nursing, pharmacy and physiotherapy are supported half to one day/week by the NORTH Foundation, to research and deliver a net zero project.

Case study: Ministry of Health Net Zero Leads (2022-24) and Hubs (2024-27) programs

To support 窪蹋勛圖厙 Local Health Districts and Specialty Health Networks, the Climate Risk and Net Zero Unit piloted a Net Zero Leads program. Ten clinicians across nursing, medicine and allied health disciplines were supported 0.2FTE each to lead a net zero project in their service or specialty and embed net zero carbon principles into the delivery of care. More than half of the Net Zero Leads were appointed from regional LHDs. The Leads addressed known carbon hotspots in anaesthetics, critical care, theatres, and pharmacy.

Given the success of the pilot, an expanded program of multi-disciplinary hubs was launched in November 2024. Seven hubs were established across known carbon hotspots including surgery, ICU, ED, renal, endoscopy, paediatrics and infection prevention services. The hubs are responsible for becoming exemplars and guiding decarbonisation activities across the state, in their service or specialty.

Case study: Gloves Off!

It is estimated that Hunter New England Local Health District uses almost ~28.3 million gloves, producing 100 tonnes of waste and a carbon footprint of 1000 tonnes CO2e.

The Gloves Off! project at John Hunter Hospital, aimed to improve hand hygiene and reduce unnecessary non-sterile glove use through the implementation of a targeted hand hygiene education program.

The project was successful in improving staff capability in performing standard precautions risk assessments, improving patient care, saving money, reducing waste and minimising Hunter New England LHDs carbon footprint.

Unnecessary glove use reduced from 60% pre- intervention to 31% post-intervention and 23% at six-month follow-up.

Hand hygiene compliance improved from 59% pre- intervention to 69% post-intervention and 83% at six-month follow-up. Ward glove purchase numbers reduced by 21%. The project achieved a waste reduction of 260kg and carbon savings of 2,566 kgCO2e, which equates to an equivalent carbon footprint of driving a fuel-efficient petrol car 7,000km (approximately halfway around Australia).

Case study: Pressure to reduce waste

Historically, there has been limited reuse of PAP devices, including both CPAP and NIV devices, within 窪蹋勛圖厙 Health loan pools and equipment allocation programs for home use.

One of the 2022/23 Sustainable Futures Innovation Fund projects investigated the presence of bacteria in air samples taken from PAP devices to develop an evidence base to support the re-purposing of respiratory equipment and guideline development.

The benchtop proof of concept study demonstrated that the risk of transmission of viable bacteria in air flow is very low; with surface swabs showing that current cleaning procedures were sufficient for removing any organisms of concern from the external surfaces. The studys findings support equipment re-use and the implementation of the Enable 窪蹋勛圖厙 Going Circular Project.

Case study: Intravenous to oral antimicrobial switch

Prolonged use of IV antimicrobial therapy to treat severe infections is common. Unnecessary prolonged use can lead to patient harm, increased risk of antimicrobial resistance and healthcare associated costs. Best practice recommendations are for processes to flag safe early IV to PO switch for antimicrobials.

One of the 2022/23 Sustainable Futures Innovation Fund project teams developed and implemented a clinical decision support tool to triage prescribed IV antimicrobial orders for a post-prescription review. The Antimicrobial Stewardship team and pharmacists are alerted to these orders when a patient meets the algorithm, pre-defined by the Clinical Applications Advisory Group for AMS. The indications list included respiratory, intraabdominal, and urological infections.

The project resulted in a 1.7-fold increase in accepting AMS recommendations to switch IV to PO, when compared to 2022. When an appropriate IV to PO switch occurred, there was a reduced Length of Stay.

Case study: Net Zero Respiratory Leads Inhale, Exhale

More than 20 million respiratory inhalers are prescribed annually in Australia. While inhalers are essential for managing respiratory illnesses, single pressurised meter dose inhalers also have a substantial carbon footprint.

For example, some pressurised meter dose inhalers emit as much carbon dioxide as a car trip from Sydney to Canberra.

Sophie Timmins, Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Physician, and her fellow Net Zero Leads at Royal North Shore Hospital tackled this issue. One of the initiatives was an inhaler collection pilot, which led to a 12-month inhaler and medication blister pack recycling program.

Through an audit, we identified high-use wards and collected 122 inhalers over eight weeks, many with remaining doses, she said. The new recycling program will introduce designated bins for empty blister packs and inhalers in inpatient wards, which we are hoping to roll out across the district if successful.

The team developed a staff educational campaign to ensure the correct disposal of inhalers and developed an asthma pathway for the Royal North Shore Hospital emergency department.

Current as at: Wednesday 28 May 2025
Contact page owner: System Purchasing